California contingency fee lawyersContingency fee lawyers in CaliforniaCalifornia contingency fee attorneys.Click Here to Send a Message to a Motorcycle Injury Lawyer
California Contingency Fee LawyerCalifornia Contingency Fee AttorneysMotorcycle Accident Injury Attorney
Consingency Fee Lawyers CaliforniaBiker LawyerCalifornia Contingency Fee Lawyer
Click Here to Send a Message to a Motorcycle Injury LawyerCalifornia Contingency Fee AttorneysHenke The BikerHenke The Trial LawyerMotorcycle Accident Checklist

Speak to
Mr. Henke
(877) 370-3233
Motorcycle Accident Lawyers



  • The Henke Law Office represents clients on a contingency fee basis. If you would like to speak to Mr. Henke personally with regard to your case, please use the e-mail Contact Form or call Mr. Henke toll free.
  • Mr. Henke and is proud to serve his clients on a contingent fee basis. In his view our most important democractic institution is our Courts and without our California contingency fee attorneys most California residents would be denied access to our Courts. Indeed, the California contingency fee system and access to California contingency fee lawyers is for the vast majority of us our only "key to the Courthouse door." It is our only practical means of obtaining redress of our rights. As a California contingency fee lawyer, Henke is aware, however, of the fact that there has been created a negative public perception of the contingency fee system and California contingency fee lawyers. The contingency fee system is often portrayed, particularly in the pervasive insurance industry propaganda, as a system by which "personal injury lawyers" take percentage of the recovery rather than hourly fees. California contingency fee lawyers are ofen portrayed as taking more than would be justified if their fees were calculated on an hourly basis. As a product of that negative public perception, it is possible that California contingency fee attorneys in general may have more difficulty at the outset in establishing the good attorney-client relationships so important to the most effective prosecution of their clients' rights. Therefore, Mr. Henke would offer to demonstrate that contrary to this unfortunate negative public perception, the contingency fee system is, in fact, both fairand essential to permit all of us equal access to this most important of democratic institutions, our courts.
  • The contingency fee system is absolutely essential if all of us, rich, middle class, and poor alike, but particularly for the middle class and poor to have any practical access to our court system. Think about it. Practically speaking, if it were not for the contingency fee system, and lawyers willing to work on a contingency fee basis, it would be only the very rich who could afford pay to assert their rights in a court of law ~ only those people who could afford to pay a lawyer by the hour. In a contested personal injury case, attorneys fees could range from several thousands of dollars to hundreds of thousands of dollars at the hourly rates charged by non-contingency fee lawyers. In the absence of the contingency fee system, therefore, the fact is that most of us would have no practical means to assert our rights in our courts of law at all.
  • Furthermore, under the usual non-contingency fee, hourly attorney/client fee arrangement, the client must pay the attorney's fees whether the attorney wins or loses the case; whereas, in contrast, under the common contingency fee agreement, the client pays attorneys fees only if a recovery is obtained. In an hourly, non-contingency fee arrangement, therefore, it is the client rather than the attorney that must take the "risk" that he will lose the investment of all the attorneys fees he’s paid to prosecute the litigation. Under an hourly, non-contingency fee attorney/client contract, if the case is lost, the hourly fee attorney doesn't give back to the client all the money the client has paid in hourly fees. In the hourly, non-contingency fee case, if the case is lost, the client must be prepared not only to suffer the defeat of his rights, but the loss of all the hourly attorneys fees he was required to pay to prosecute the case.
  • There can be advantages to paying a California attorney an hourly fee to prosecute litigation, conceivably even personal injury litigation. However, clearly it is only by virtue of the California contingency fee system and California contingency fee lawyers willing to take the risk for their clients that injured victims, rich, middle class, and the poor alike are empowered to pursue their rights in a court of law, without paying any attorneys fees until the case is completed, and even then, only if a recovery is obtained. Indeed, it is only by virtue of the California contingency fee system, that most clients may avail an attorney's services at all, enjoy the benefit of his "day in court," and with the peace of mind that even if his case should fail, he will be able to walk away free of any financial obligation for the attorney time that was required to obtain his "day in court."
  • So, in the absence of our California contingency fee system, and our California contingency fee lawyers, what proportion of the public do you think would have the wealth to pay hourly attorneys fees and litigation costs in order to purchase their admission to assert their rights in our courts? Would we really want a system of justice where justice itself was available only to those who could afford to pay for it? NO! This much maligned contingency fee system of ours serves an absolutely essential democratic function to make our courts equally accessible to all people, regardless of their economic status.
  • Every time the insurance industry sets out to undermine the California contingency fee system, with its pandering legislative lobbying, or with its "tort reform" initiatives, what do you suspect are the insurance industry's motives? Should we take at face value the calculated message of the insurers $100,000 twenty second television ads, always made to appear as though they were "sponsored by" a “concerned citizens” group? Should we believe that the insurers who attack the California contingency fee system and California contingincy fee lawyers are motivated by a good, high and altruistic calling to protect the public from overreaching contingency fee lawyers? Of course not! So, why do insurers so vehemently attack the California contingency fee system? Well, perhaps it is to achieve precisely the effect that their carefully drafted "tort reform" initiatives and lobbied for legislation would have if enacted and actually put into practice. Think about it. The insurers want to avoid paying the valid claims of accident victims for injuries caused by those they insure ~~ claims which the insurers will continue to be held responsible to pay so long as accident victims retain the practical ability to avail the services of a California contingency fee lawyer and hence our court system to prosecute their worthy cases. The answer: Insurers attempt to create public hostility to California contingency fee lawyers and the only existing system that permits the public access to the courts solely and specifically in order to impair the ordinary man’s practical ability to have his "day in court."
  • It is only as an unfortunate bi-product of the insurance industry's "tort reform" campaigns and the industry's ongoing efforts generally to undermine public support for the contingency fee system that this unfortunate negative public impression of the contingency fee system and California contingency fee lawyers is created.
  • Now, is the contingency fee system perfect? Clearly not. Is there any other system that has ever been proposed by the insurance industry, or our legislators or anyone else for that matter, that would do a better job to permit all people access to our court system? The answer is "NO."


Motorcycle Accident Lawyer

Serving Motorcyclists
Free Consultation
CLICK HERE to Submit
Case Questionnaire